About   :   Wallpapers   
8889 films, 16633 profiles, and counting

  • films
  • people
  • blogs
Twitter  Facebook



Upperstall Review





Tamil, Action, Drama, 2014, Color

Lingaa (Rajinikanth) is a petty thief with a grudge against his grandfather, Raja Lingeswaran (Rajinikanth again,) for not leaving any of his enormous wealth for his descendants. He is tricked by TV reporter Lakshmi (Anushka) to come to her village where UK returned Engineer and District Collector Raja Lingeswaram, in 1939, took on the British and built a dam and a temple there for villagers of 36 villages. The British through deceit had the villagers turn against the benevolent King who sacrificed all his wealth for them, and shut down the temple. Today, the local politician (Jagapathy Babu) wants to destroy the dam saying it is unsafe and have a new one built. However an upright Engineer (Ponvannan) will have none of it. He is murdered but before dying throws the piece of incriminating evidence declaring the dam safe in the compound of the temple and tells a village elderly that the temple must be opened to save the dam and the village. The elderly villager (K Vishwanath) gets Lakshmi, his grand-daughter, to trace Lingaa out to open the temple for them. Lingaa, on the run from the police, comes there only to try and steal the idol from the temple and escape. But on hearing his grandfather's story, he realizes he has misjudged him and decides that he has to take up the fight of the villagers and live up to his grandfather's name and save the dam...

One wonders if a film like Lingaa even needs reviewing. The primary aim of the film overriding any so called cinematic aesthetics is to keep Rajinikanth's huge fan pace happy. And with the film giving them two Rajinis - one in 1939 and the other in present day India, who are actually grandfather and grandson - there's more than enough to keep them ecstatic. With Rajini in every frame, there's also just enough of a story mounted lavishly on a huge scale (not including the terribly tacky CG work in the climax) to keep events going even if the pace is somewhat sluggish and the running time of 175 minutes begins to tell. But with Rajini doing what he has to do, the fans are on cloud nine, the shows are all full, record collections are expected everywhere, and the festivities are on. So in that sense mission accomplished. End of story, end of review.

Still, if one were to actually review the film, then one would have said that the film is a mixed bag. While it throws in many elements into its plot, the safe and typical screenplay makes it appear wafer thin and just about functional. The film, after a lightweight start in the present with stereotypical items like the hero's intro with a solo song, its focus on comedy (handled ably enough by Santhanam), gets into a higher gear once the 1939 flashback segment kicks in. Inspired by British Army Engineer Colonel John Pennycuick who constructed the Mullaiperiyar dam after mortgaging his property, this portion of the film, even if much too long, still has its share of moments. Rajini is much more at home in the comparatively more human character of the benevolent Raja Lingeswaran who is a king, collector and engineer, and who on his own builds a dam for villagers of 36 villages to secure their future against drought and floods. In fact, these sequences see the actor in Rajini struggling to come out of his huge image. It has to be said he even succeeds in sequences like the one where the villagers meet him and find him living humbly and he forgives them for kicking him out after all he has done for them. Yes, there is an accomplished actor beneath the mask of the superstar. Otherwise, it is at times sad to see a performer so trapped in his image that he becomes a parody of himself. And even if the film is huge, KS Ravikumar lacks the skill and flair of a Shankar and this is invoked in the film as we find references to Sivaji the Boss (2007) and some set pieces even designed similar to the earlier film.

As against the mediocre present day sections, the 1939 portions of the film are plotted much, much better in terms of its characters, treatment and the dealing of its main conflict. Even the obvious mainstream elements work so much better here be it the developing romance between Rajini and Sonakshi Sinha, the confrontation scenes with the British villain (ineffectual performance by him though), and the well executed train fight. The dialogue cleverly weaves in patriotic dialogue, a strong spiritual philosophy of living a simple and kindly life, a memorable punch line or two or more (I have not failed. I have postponed my success) with elements of Rajini's life outside of the screen. So yes, the script weaves in a sequence where Raja Lingeswaran celebrates his birthday, and a happy birthday song is sung to him and with the film releasing on the superstar's birthday, the fans in the theatre erupted with glee! And as the Rajini character is hailed as a messiah, everyone suggests to him that he could make it right to the top in politics if he so desired. Clearly echoes of real life here.

Of the rest of the cast, though the heroines are functional, Sonakshi Sinha comes off better. Photographed beautifully, she breathes some life into a character of a village belle with some spunk and is endearing. Anushka Shetty is handicapped by an inconsistent characterization. If on one hand, she is a smart journalist involved in sting operations, on the other, her romantic sequences with Rajini are dull and she appears the perfect stereotypical bimbo in them. The huge supporting cast do their bit well enough particularly K Vishwanath and Radha Ravi making a strong impact. However, the antagonists in both stories are weak and this somewhat dilutes Rajini's victories over them. This is a major shortcoming in the film. Jagapathy Babu, in particular, makes no impression at all.

The other major disappointment is that AR Rahman's music fails to make the impact it should, both in the songs and in the background as well. Otherwise on the technical side, one has to make a mention of Rathnavelu's camerawork and Sabu Cyril's lavish Production Design in some of the sequences. One has to mention that merely having an old steam engine train and some antique cars doesn't make for authentic period recreation. Rajinikanth is shown reading Joseph Campbell's Hero With a Thousand Faces (yes, we get the connection) a decade before it was actually published and the look and styling of the characters is nowhere 1939. But then audiences in our films have never cared about these things and they will not here either.

I am not going to rate this film. But what I can say is that as a film for Rajini's fans, it easily qualifies for a 80% plus score. But if I were to delve more into its cinematic content and filmmaking aesthetics, I'd have to give it about 37% at most.

Upperstall review by: Karan Bali aka TheThirdMan





Your screen size is


blog comments powered by Disqus

Introverts range from the sorrowful, quiet types with few or no friends to the beaming, star performers with a zillion f...
I is an Indian retelling of the beauty and the beast in a contemporary setting. It begins as a simple film that...
The problem with the incessant and tedious remakes of South Indian movies (Telugu film Okkadu in this case) is ...
Anurag Kashyap has a knack of ruffling feathers. Among the sea of mediocrity in Bollywood, his films have always held up...
With his earlier three films, the Munna Bhai series and 3 Idiots, Rajkumar Hirani has created his own ...
One wonders if a film like Lingaa even needs reviewing. The primary aim of the film overriding any so called ci...
Veteran actor P Jairaj, who passed away at the Lilavati Hospital in Mumbai on August 11, 2000, was...
Mohammed Rafi
Mohammed Rafi was perhaps the most popular male playback singer ever and maybe the second most pop...
Whenever a poll has been conducted to name the best actress ever in Tamil and Telugu cinema, one n...